Just a reminder that it's OSHUG meeting #4 this Thursday and if you plan to
attend but have not already registered to please do so. We've a great
agenda with talks on mbed, DesignSpark and London Hackspace. For more
information and to register see:
http://oshug.org/event/4
Regards,
Andrew
--
Andrew Back
mailto:andrew@osmosoft.com
http://carrierdetect.com
Hello,
Details are now up on the website for the fourth OSHUG meeting:
http://oshug.org/event/4
Still waiting for a few more details from DesignSpark and London Hackspace,
but registration is now live. We'll add further details as and when we have
them.
The theme for OSHUG #5 will be radio and we have a talk on the extremely
cool OpenHPSDR platform confirmed.
http://openhpsdr.org/
Still looking for a couple more speakers. Might be nice to have a talk on
the affordable Softrock SDR radios, or perhaps something non-ham related,
e.g. an open source hardware GPS, RFID, UWB or more classical radio platform
or project. As ever suggestions and offers to present are most welcome and
indeed encouraged.
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Back
mailto:andrew@osmosoft.com
http://carrierdetect.com
In case anyone here isn't aware of the London Hackspace, you might like
to know that they've opened a new space in Hoxton.
To celebrate this, there's a spacewarming party .. come along and find
out about the hackspace group and the space facilities.
http://wiki.hackspace.org.uk/wiki/Spacewarming_party
-adrian
Forwarded at the request of Ayah:
From: ayah bdeir <ayahbdeir(a)gmail.com>
Date: July 15, 2010 12:03:21 PM GMT+03:00
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure(a)gmail.com>, Open Manufacturing
<openmanufacturing(a)googlegroups.com>, cc-patents(a)lists.ibiblio.org,
diybio <diybio(a)googlegroups.com>, Open Source Hardware User Group
<oshug(a)oshug.org>
Subject: draft of open hardware definition released!
Hello all,
I've had a discussion about this with a few of you already, but
thought would be much better to email the lists. Yesterday, a group of
us, who had been working on an open hardware definition, released
version 0.3 for public comment.
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2010/07/open_source_hardware_-_oshw_draft_…
We would love your feedback, questions, and signatures! It's very
important for this effort to be inclusive. We are also holding an open
hardware summit:
http://www.openhardwaresummit.org on September 23rd in New York. I
will send an official call for submissions later this week, but in the
meantime, please do consider attending, submitting or supporting.
thanks!
ayah
--------------------------------------------
ayah bdeir - www.ayahbdeir.com
MS. MIT Media Lab - www.media.mit.edu
adjunct faculty at NYU - ab197(a)nyu.edu
senior fellow at Eyebeam - www.eyebeam.org
founder - www.littlebits.cc
Hello,
An Open Source Hardware Definition has been drafted and has a growing
number of signatories, some of which are fairly prolific:
http://freedomdefined.org/OSHW
And in related news, there is to be an Open Source Hardware Summit in
New York in September:
http://www.openhardwaresummit.org/
Regards,
Andrew
--
Andrew Back
mailto:andrew@osmosoft.com
http://carrierdetect.com
Hello,
Just to remind folks that if they intend on coming along on Thursday they
will need to register:
http://oshugsuccess.eventbrite.com/
Apologies to those who have already registered.
If possible try and arrive between 17:45 and 18:00. If you arrive later you
may need to give one of us a call on the number of the door, so that we can
come down and let you in.
Regards,
Andrew
--
Andrew Back
mailto:andrew@osmosoft.com
http://carrierdetect.com
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Matthew McCabe wrote:
> Hmm, so where does this leave the inventor who does not have a day job and
> wants to make a living creating new products? I am a bit torn on this issue
R&D phase does take resources and money so that you can coast while
your stuff doesn't actually exist yet. That's true. There are all
sorts of arrangements to make that happen. After that, it's
sales/branding mostly.
> I am interested to look at hybrid models where a product IS protected by a
> patent or copyright but much of the info needed to produce the thing is
> given away for free. Thus, you basically choose to license the patent to
> whomever wants to use it for personal or, possibly, commercial use. I have
> been thinking about how to apply this idea and it is tricky... How, for
> example, do you make a profit from something if you are giving it away for
> free?
Uh, how about you just use an open source hardware license (something
akin to TAPR but not necessarily TAPR) and then a non-assert agreement
(if you have a patent)? This is along the lines of the Creative
Commons / Science Commons with the PPL license -- but there are some
minor differences I recall. In the case of the Open Invention Network,
they are literally transferring ownership of patents into the pool.
IMHO transferring ownership of the patents is only because that's what
everyone understands (everyone understands a patent pool) but it's not
necessary, I think. You make money by selling kits, instructions, a
good user experience.
> I would love to hear other perspectives on this issue. Also, we may want to
> schedule a talk with one of the IP attorneys in town to get an idea of how
> to appropriately protect IP (or not). And to prod them a bit about these
> hybrid models or just giving something away for free.
I have been looking to work with (as in, hire/pay for) an IP attorney
to help draft a better open source hardware license, plus non-assert
agreements, for Gnusha- the open source tech co-op. However, I
strongly encourage this to be completely separate from Austin
Hackerspace internals-- that'd be cause for alarm and
abandoning/jumping ship.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: kampower <echez99(a)gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM
Subject: [FAB@HOME] Survey on community expectations in Fab@Home governance
To: "Fab@Home Forums" <fabathome-forums(a)googlegroups.com>
Hi everybody,
I'm a masters student at TUHH, Technical University of Hamburg. As
part of my master’s thesis, I am carrying out a survey to better
understand your experience and expectations with regards to the
organization of Open design projects.
Your opinion as Fab@Home user and community member is very important
to me!
That's why I'm inviting you to fill out my survey. Answering the
questions may take about 8-10 minutes. The individual responses will
be kept strictly confidential, aggregated results will be published as
soon as the survey is finished. If you are interested, I can also
provide some specific results about the Fab@Home community.
Please follow this link or copy to your browser if you experience any
problems.
http://cgi.tu-harburg.de/~somo1774/survey/index.php?sid=19333&newtest=Y&.<http://cgi.tu-harburg.de/%7Esomo1774/survey/index.php?sid=19333&newtest=Y&.>
..
The survey is conducted on a per project basis. In case you receive my
request more than once, it’s because you are involved in several
communities. It would be great if you would fill out the survey more
than once, for all projects which are relevant to you.
If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to
contact me. If you are interested in more details about this research
work, please take a look at:
http://open-innovation-projects.org/my-research/#part3
Thank you very much for your help!
Best regards
Marvelous
marvelous.onwukamike(a)tu-harburg.de
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fab@Home Forums" group.
To post to this group, send email to fabathome-forums(a)googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
fabathome-forums+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com<fabathome-forums%2Bunsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fabathome-forums?hl=en.
--
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507